Tag <span class=energy" src="/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/cropped-office-building-secondary-1.jpg">

Tag energy

The limits of national politics in driving renewable energy

The SSC Team January 24, 2017 Tags: , , Strategic Sustainability Consulting No comments

A lot of people in the sustainability field, whether as consultants, advocates, or managers are asking themselves: How will the new presidential administration in the U.S. affect the “green” economy?

In the months leading up to his inauguration, the incoming president called climate change a “hoax,” announced plans to dismantle the EPA, and vocally denounced U.S. participation in the Paris Climate Accords.

Although it is disconcerting, dangerous, and misinformed to marginalize global climate change, we are fairly certain that corporations engaging in meaningful sustainability strategy, renewable energy innovation, and green investing across global markets will continue to rise.

Business itself is driving much of the demand for renewables. Consumers want sustainable products. Innovators are always looking for the newest mousetrap. And in our wired world, innovation means more energy efficiency across industries from national defense to personal electronics to keep costs down and power up.

The Renewable Energy Sector Will Continue to Grow

In fact, three of the incoming cabinet members have already distanced themselves from the official White House positions. The marketplace and our international partners and competitors are seeing the advantages of investing in renewable energy, from decreased energy dependency to creating new jobs.

Whether or not the president changes his mind on climate change or sustainability, the market will continue to drive us toward a greener future. Sustainability is the driver of innovation in 2017, and there’s no going back on that. 

TED Talks Sustainability: How Fear of Nuclear Power is Hurting the Environment

The SSC Team October 6, 2016 Tags: , Strategic Sustainability Consulting No comments

We love TED Talks! Here’s one of our favorites:

Climate policy expert Michael Shellenberger is focused on critically thinking about the economic, social, and environmental implications of global climate change. His take: “We’re not in a clean energy revolution; we’re in a clean energy crisis.”

Amidst longstanding fears of nuclear power plant accidents and failures, he is concerned that the actual risks outweigh the benefits – and if we don’t capitalize on those benefits, everyone will suffer. 

 

Webinar to Watch: A Next-Generation Solar Strategy for Commercial Operations

The SSC Team July 7, 2016 Tags: , , , Strategic Sustainability Consulting No comments

A Next-Generation Solar Strategy for Commercial Operations

July 19, 2016 @ 1pm Eastern

Presented by GreenBiz

Companies often find that the power grid is the leading contributor to their carbon footprint, but the barriers to sustainable energy for most businesses is way too high. Check out this free webinar about how companies can purchase solar energy and significantly reduce their impact from electricity use.

 

 

Webinar to Watch: A Next-Generation Solar Strategy for Commercial Operations

The SSC Team July 7, 2016 Tags: , , , Strategic Sustainability Consulting No comments

A Next-Generation Solar Strategy for Commercial Operations

July 19, 2016 @ 1pm Eastern

Presented by GreenBiz

Companies often find that the power grid is the leading contributor to their carbon footprint, but the barriers to sustainable energy for most businesses is way too high. Check out this free webinar about how companies can purchase solar energy and significantly reduce their impact from electricity use.

 

 

White Paper Worth Reading: 2016 Global Energy Market Trends

The SSC Team March 24, 2016 Tags: , , Strategic Sustainability Consulting No comments

It's shaping up to be an exciting year for the energy market as various environmental, regulatory, and marketplace dynamics continue to cause tumult. 

Organizations need to know which variables in energy will impact their businesses.

Check out this white paper about the six key themes that are critical to watch in 2016. 

6 for 2016: Global Energy Market Trends

How does your company's energy risk profile look like? Do you need help assessing your impact due to energy use? Contact us for information about capturing, analyzing and reporting energy use data. 

White Paper Worth Reading: 2016 Global Energy Market Trends

The SSC Team March 24, 2016 Tags: , , Strategic Sustainability Consulting No comments

It's shaping up to be an exciting year for the energy market as various environmental, regulatory, and marketplace dynamics continue to cause tumult. 

Organizations need to know which variables in energy will impact their businesses.

Check out this white paper about the six key themes that are critical to watch in 2016. 

6 for 2016: Global Energy Market Trends

How does your company's energy risk profile look like? Do you need help assessing your impact due to energy use? Contact us for information about capturing, analyzing and reporting energy use data. 

White Paper Worth Reading: 2016 Global Energy Market Trends

The SSC Team March 24, 2016 Tags: , , Strategic Sustainability Consulting No comments

It's shaping up to be an exciting year for the energy market as various environmental, regulatory, and marketplace dynamics continue to cause tumult. 

Organizations need to know which variables in energy will impact their businesses.

Check out this white paper about the six key themes that are critical to watch in 2016. 

6 for 2016: Global Energy Market Trends

How does your company's energy risk profile look like? Do you need help assessing your impact due to energy use? Contact us for information about capturing, analyzing and reporting energy use data. 

Are Google and Amazon Underestimating Their Own Carbon Footprints?

The SSC Team March 15, 2016 Tags: , , , , Strategic Sustainability Consulting No comments

Two of the world’s leading technology companies are under fire for underestimating data centers’ carbon footprints amid claims they use an obsolete tool for calculating emissions from electricity they purchase off the power grid.  

Lux Research, an independent research and advisory firm, went after the two tech giants for using tools that make broad generalizations about power production in the regions where Google and Amazon have large data facilities – reporting that the two companies may be underestimating their carbon footprints by 42,000 MT CO2e per year and 85,000 MT CO2e per year, respectively.

It’s pretty clear that Lux is using Google’s and Amazon’s data – data based on the EPA’s Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID) – to tout its own analytical tool that estimates GHG emissions from electricity use.

What is important to note here is: the world of sustainability tools out there is rapidly moving. What you report today can be disputed tomorrow as new analytical tools, calculators, and data sets are developed.  

It’s not that eGRID is a terrible tool, or that Lux has built a surefire new solution, it’s more about choosing the right tool, at the right time, and at the right level of detail for your individual case.

Not every company needs a power-plant-by-power-plant analysis of its power sourcing, as the cost of a microscopic look at GHG emissions in this area may outweigh the overall variation in results. In other words, for many companies, the eGRID analysis would be absolutely acceptable based on moderate use of electricity in a given area as the overall data is within an acceptable margin of error.

However, power-intense companies like Google and Amazing, using vast amounts of energy, should absolutely be looking for the most refined and detailed tool to analyze power use impact. Being off by just a small percentage can represent tens of thousands of tons of CO2 being left un-reported, and more accurate data should help inform locations of future data centers to optimize clean power use.

If an organization is new to sustainability reporting, GHG calculating or meeting industry standards for environmental data, it is highly unlikely that that organization is going to be able to navigate these ever-changing waters without help.

Partnering with an experienced consulting firm like SSC, with the background knowledge and experience, to choose the best-fit reporting tool for every individual case is critical. Contact us today to talk about your carbon footprint analysis.  

 

 

Are Google and Amazon Underestimating Their Own Carbon Footprints?

The SSC Team March 15, 2016 Tags: , , , , Strategic Sustainability Consulting No comments

Two of the world’s leading technology companies are under fire for underestimating data centers’ carbon footprints amid claims they use an obsolete tool for calculating emissions from electricity they purchase off the power grid.  

Lux Research, an independent research and advisory firm, went after the two tech giants for using tools that make broad generalizations about power production in the regions where Google and Amazon have large data facilities – reporting that the two companies may be underestimating their carbon footprints by 42,000 MT CO2e per year and 85,000 MT CO2e per year, respectively.

It’s pretty clear that Lux is using Google’s and Amazon’s data – data based on the EPA’s Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID) – to tout its own analytical tool that estimates GHG emissions from electricity use.

What is important to note here is: the world of sustainability tools out there is rapidly moving. What you report today can be disputed tomorrow as new analytical tools, calculators, and data sets are developed.  

It’s not that eGRID is a terrible tool, or that Lux has built a surefire new solution, it’s more about choosing the right tool, at the right time, and at the right level of detail for your individual case.

Not every company needs a power-plant-by-power-plant analysis of its power sourcing, as the cost of a microscopic look at GHG emissions in this area may outweigh the overall variation in results. In other words, for many companies, the eGRID analysis would be absolutely acceptable based on moderate use of electricity in a given area as the overall data is within an acceptable margin of error.

However, power-intense companies like Google and Amazing, using vast amounts of energy, should absolutely be looking for the most refined and detailed tool to analyze power use impact. Being off by just a small percentage can represent tens of thousands of tons of CO2 being left un-reported, and more accurate data should help inform locations of future data centers to optimize clean power use.

If an organization is new to sustainability reporting, GHG calculating or meeting industry standards for environmental data, it is highly unlikely that that organization is going to be able to navigate these ever-changing waters without help.

Partnering with an experienced consulting firm like SSC, with the background knowledge and experience, to choose the best-fit reporting tool for every individual case is critical. Contact us today to talk about your carbon footprint analysis.  

 

 

Scope 3 Emissions: Which Ones Matter?

The SSC Team March 3, 2016 Tags: , , Strategic Sustainability Consulting No comments

Enjoy this post from the SCC Archives: 

If your company is getting ready to calculate its annual carbon footprint (or is thinking about doing it for the first time), you'll definitely want to pay attention:

In this 6-minute video, SSC President Jennifer Woofter provides an overview of the new Scope 3 emissions guide – developed by the World Resources Institute (WRI) and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), and published on the Greenhouse Gas Protocol website.  Jennifer explains how different companies may choose to approach the 15 categories of Scope 3 emissions, depending on their industry, operating structure, and internal capacity.

 

If your company would like to talk about carbon footprinting or developing a sustainability report, contact us to set up a 15-minute introductory phone assessment today.